From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarado v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv738 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 16, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv738

06-16-2016

JORGE ANTONIO ALVARADO v. EDGAR BAKER, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Plaintiff Jorge Alvarado, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

Alvarado complained that TDCJ officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety. The magistrate judge conducted an evidentiary hearing and issued a report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Alvarado received a copy of this report but filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings, records, and testimony in this cause as well as the report of the magistrate judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the report of the magistrate judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a magistrate judge's report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.") It is accordingly

ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge (docket no. 26) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED.

SIGNED this 16th day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Alvarado v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Jun 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv738 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Alvarado v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:JORGE ANTONIO ALVARADO v. EDGAR BAKER, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Jun 16, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14cv738 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 16, 2016)