From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 24, 2020
950 N.W.2d 735 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 161533 COA: 348953 SC: 161534 COA: 348954

11-24-2020

Dean ALTOBELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael W. HARTMANN, Michael P. Coakley, Anna M. Maiuri, Joseph M. Fazio, Douglas M. Kilbourne, John D. Leslie, and Jerome R. Watson, Defendants-Appellees. Dean Altobelli, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 24, 2020
950 N.W.2d 735 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Case Details

Full title:DEAN ALTOBELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL W. HARTMANN, MICHAEL P…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

950 N.W.2d 735 (Mich. 2020)