From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ALTMAN v. BECK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

May, 1915.


The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. There is no proof that the judgment assigned to respondent is a lien upon the mortgaged premises, as there is no evidence of the estate or interest of Holmes in the premises. The indefinite allegation in the complaint is insufficient. This defect is fatal. The reversal is without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon further proof. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

ALTMAN v. BECK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

ALTMAN v. BECK

Case Details

Full title:Aron Altman, Appellant, v. Gesine Beck and Others, Defendants. Benjamin…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)