From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Altinel v. Kaldirim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 23, 2024
8:23-cv-02284-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-02284-JWH(DFMx)

01-23-2024

Nese Altinel v. Zafer Kaldirim, et al.


Present: The Honorable JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiffs' and Defendant's Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report

On December 21, 2023, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling Conference for February 2, 2024 [ECF No. 13]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today's date, the parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, Nese Altinel and counsel for Defendants, Zafer Kaldirim and Beast Group LLC to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Counsel are DIRECTED to respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, January 29, 2024, at 12:00 noon. Counsel's failure to respond-or counsel's filing of an inadequate response-may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Altinel v. Kaldirim

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 23, 2024
8:23-cv-02284-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Altinel v. Kaldirim

Case Details

Full title:Nese Altinel v. Zafer Kaldirim, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-02284-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2024)