From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Fontana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 6, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court, Westchester County, that vacatur of the notice of pendency was warranted because the plaintiff, by the requests for relief in its complaint, did not seek to affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, the defendants' real property (see, 5303 Realty Corp. v O Y Equity Corp., 64 N.Y.2d 313; Long Is. City Sav. Loan Assn. v Gottlieb, 90 A.D.2d 766, mod on other grounds 58 N.Y.2d 931). Bracken, J. P, Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Fontana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Alternate Energy Management Corp. v. Fontana

Case Details

Full title:ALTERNATE ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORP., Appellant, v. JOHN P. FONTANA et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Chang v. 168 Realty Corp.

With respect to the filing of the notice of pendency against Unit #3A, a court, when considering a motion to…

Basso v. Oliver

Accordingly, dismissal is granted pursuant to CPLR §6514(a).Further, and notwithstanding this determination,…