Opinion
June 6, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court, Westchester County, that vacatur of the notice of pendency was warranted because the plaintiff, by the requests for relief in its complaint, did not seek to affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, the defendants' real property (see, 5303 Realty Corp. v O Y Equity Corp., 64 N.Y.2d 313; Long Is. City Sav. Loan Assn. v Gottlieb, 90 A.D.2d 766, mod on other grounds 58 N.Y.2d 931). Bracken, J. P, Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.