From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alter v. McConnell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 29, 2024
2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD

02-29-2024

JOSEPH SCOTT ALTER, Plaintiff, v. MITCH MCCONNELL, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, the records on file herein, the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the “Final Report”), and Plaintiff's Objections to the Initial Report [Dkt. Nos. 30-32] and the Final Report [Dkt. Nos. 36, 37]. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of the portions of the Initial Report and Final Report to which Plaintiff has objected.

This Final Report is identical to the Initial Report with one exception: The Final Report omits the venue discussion. The Recommendation that the First Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice remains unchanged.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in the Final Report and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 11] be dismissed without leave to amend and judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Alter v. McConnell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 29, 2024
2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Alter v. McConnell

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SCOTT ALTER, Plaintiff, v. MITCH MCCONNELL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 29, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD (C.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2024)