From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alston v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-247 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-247

11-28-2018

NICHOLAS ALSTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHIL PLUMMER, Defendant.


DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT THE REPORT OF CGL COMPANIES AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 803(8)(A)(iii) (DOC. #40)

As discussed during the conference call held on November 26, 2018, the Court SUSTAINS Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Admit the Report of CGL Companies as an Exception to the Hearsay Rule Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 803(8)(A)(iii), the public records exception. Doc. #40.

During the conference call, counsel for Defendant stipulated to the authenticity of this Report and indicated that she had no objections to Plaintiffs' use of the Report at the Preliminary Injunction Hearing. She did, however, reserve the right to object with respect to its relevancy. In addition, she noted that Defendant did not stipulate to the authenticity or admissibility of the slides and email messages related to the Report. This was to be the subject of further discussions between counsel and will be revisited during the conference call scheduled for 4:00 p.m. on November 29, 2018. Date: November 28, 2018

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Alston v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 28, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-247 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Alston v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS ALSTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PHIL PLUMMER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-247 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2018)