From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alsheimer v. Evarts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1598) CA 01-01505

December 21, 2001.

(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Latham, J. — Summary Judgment.)

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HAYES, WISNER, SCUDDER AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking a declaration of their rights and obligations following the sale of their tax preparation business to defendants, and defendants asserted a counterclaim seeking recission of the sale. Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the complaint. "When a viable counterclaim arises from the same underlying transaction as is involved in the main action and is inseparable from or inextricably intertwined with that transaction, summary judgment should be denied" ( Yoi-Lee Realty Corp. v. 177th St. Realty Assocs., 208 A.D.2d 185, 189; see also, Milligan Contr. v. Mancini Assocs., 174 A.D.2d 136, 138).

We note, however, that the court erred in finding that there is a triable issue of fact whether the sale of the business included its good will. "Implicit in the sale of a business, unless expressly reserved, is the sale of its `good will'" ( Borne Chem. Co. v. Dictrow, 85 A.D.2d 646, 647; see, Meteor Indus. v. Metalloy Indus., 149 A.D.2d 483, 486), and it is undisputed that good will was not expressly reserved from the sale of the business. Thus, good will was included in the sale as a matter of law. In addition, we note that the court erred in indicating in its decision that it would consider issuing a preliminary injunction preventing plaintiffs from operating a tax preparation business in direct competition with defendants. In the absence of a covenant not to compete, plaintiffs are not barred from engaging in a competing business ( see, Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. Kessler, 52 N.Y.2d 276, 283).


Summaries of

Alsheimer v. Evarts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 21, 2001
289 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Alsheimer v. Evarts

Case Details

Full title:WALTER ALSHEIMER AND BARBARA ALSHEIMER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 788

Citing Cases

Town of West Seneca v. American Ref-Fuel Co.

We further conclude, however, that the court properly denied that part of defendant's motion with respect to…

Stamack, Inc. v. Romero

Furthermore, Plaintiffs never imposed anticompetitive covenants upon Defendants. (See Mohawk Maintenance Co.,…