From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Al'Shahid v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 21, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-33 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-33

02-21-2020

Curtis Al'Shahid, Plaintiff, v. Stuart Hudson, et al., Defendants.


Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers

OPINION AND ORDER

On January 29, 2020, Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers issued an Order and Report and Recommendation ("R&R") denying Plaintiff's motion to strike, denying Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and recommending that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied. R&R, ECF No. 50.

Chief Magistrate Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 13. She also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id.

The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 27, is DENIED in accordance with the R&R.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael H. Watson

MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Al'Shahid v. Hudson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 21, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-33 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Al'Shahid v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Al'Shahid, Plaintiff, v. Stuart Hudson, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-33 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 21, 2020)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Houk

As a result, federal courts in this district are now performing merits review of the application of Ohio's…