Almond v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Echols v. State

    474 S.E.2d 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 2 times

    1. Viewing this evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, it was sufficient to enable rational jurors to infer that defendant broke into the church with the intent to commit theft, and thus to find defendant guilty of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Almond v. State, 152 Ga. App. 661 ( 263 S.E.2d 533) (1979). 2.

  2. Burks v. State

    276 S.E.2d 679 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

    With or without the confession (the truth of which the defendant denied on the trial) the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. Almond v. State, 152 Ga. App. 661 ( 263 S.E.2d 533) (1979); Dent v. State, 149 Ga. App. 33 ( 253 S.E.2d 431) (1979); Crawford v. State, 148 Ga. App. 131 (3) ( 251 S.E.2d 84) (1978). Judgment affirmed. Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

  3. Burkes v. State

    269 S.E.2d 496 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

    Our review of the entire record convinces us that the evidence would authorize a rational trior of fact to find appellant guilty of the offense of robbery beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); Almond v. State, 152 Ga. App. 661 ( 263 S.E.2d 533) (1979). Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.