From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almond v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 8, 1976
138 Ga. App. 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Summary

concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court's grant of the motion was "nugatory and void"

Summary of this case from Gordon v. Dennis

Opinion

51771.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 2, 1976.

DECIDED MARCH 8, 1976.

Action on note. Butts Superior Court. Before Judge Sosebee.

Gettle Fraser, Sherman C. Fraser, for appellants.

Larry Evans, for appellee.


On May 28, 1975, a notice of appeal was filed in the trial court in this case. The transcript of evidence was not filed in the time (June 27, 1975) required by Code Ann. § 6-806. On June 30, 1975, an application was made for extending the time for filing the transcript until July 30, 1975 which was granted and an order was entered to that effect. There was no other applications for or orders extending the time for filing the transcript. The transcript was filed on August 27, 1975. The appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal was sustained. Held:

Code Ann. § 6-804 provides that an application for an extension of time must be made before the expiration of the period for filing as originally prescribed. To comply with this provision, the appellant was required to file for an extension prior to June 27, 1975. This he did not do and the order of June 30, 1975 was nugatory and void. Baxter v. Long, 122 Ga. App. 500 ( 177 S.E.2d 712). As there were no valid orders extending the time for filing the transcript and no excuse or justification was advanced for this sixty day delay, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appeal.

Judgment affirmed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 2, 1976 — DECIDED MARCH 8, 1976.


Summaries of

Almond v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 8, 1976
138 Ga. App. 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

concluding that because appellant applied for extension of time to file transcript after the initial filing period expired, trial court's grant of the motion was "nugatory and void"

Summary of this case from Gordon v. Dennis
Case details for

Almond v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:ALMOND et al. v. ROBERTSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 8, 1976

Citations

138 Ga. App. 22 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
225 S.E.2d 486

Citing Cases

Hadavi v. Palmer

Accordingly, the trial court's order in Case No. A02A2083 is affirmed. See Almond v. Robertson, 138 Ga. App.…

ACCC Ins. Co. v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

Since ACCC Insurance only applied for an extension months after the initial filing period had expired, the…