From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almeida v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
1:11-cv-01224-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01224-DLB (HC) Doc. 13

09-13-2011

CARLOS H. ALMEIDA, Petitioner, v. P.T. SMITH, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CHANGE NAME OF RESPONDENT

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

When the petition was initially filed, Petitioner named the Attorney General of the State of California. A petitioner filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus must name the state officer who has custody of the petitioner as the respondent. Rule 2 (a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996). Normally, the person having custody of an incarcerated petitioner is the warden of the prison in which the petitioner is incarcerated because the warden has "day-to-day control over" the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994).

On August 9, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in that Petitioner had not named a proper Respondent. On September 2, 2011, Petitioner filed an amended petition naming Warden Smith as the Respondent.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to substitute Warden Smith as the Respondent in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Almeida v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2011
1:11-cv-01224-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Almeida v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS H. ALMEIDA, Petitioner, v. P.T. SMITH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01224-DLB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2011)