From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almeida v. Ducart

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 12, 2019
No. 17-16302 (9th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-16302

06-12-2019

CARLOS ALMEIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL, Assistant Warden; D. GONGORA; J. BEESON, Special Agent; R. BURT, Special Agent; B. NEAL, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.


D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02689-JD
Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER Before: GRABER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON, District Judge.

The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation. --------

The mandate issued on May 16, 2019 is recalled, and the panel issues the following changes to the memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2019:

Page 1, lines 1-2, replacing "pro se federal habeas petition" with "Section 1983 complaint"
Page 2, line 3, replacing "petition" with "complaint"

No further motions will be entertained in this case, and the mandate will be reissued forthwith. The petition for panel rehearing, filed June 6, 2019, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Almeida v. Ducart

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 12, 2019
No. 17-16302 (9th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Almeida v. Ducart

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ALMEIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 12, 2019

Citations

No. 17-16302 (9th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)