From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almeda E. v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 29, 2024
CIV. 2:24-cv-2-KRS (D.N.M. Jul. 29, 2024)

Opinion

CIV. 2:24-cv-2-KRS

07-29-2024

STACEY ALMEDA E., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

JESSICA MILANO KATHERINE O'NEAL


JESSICA MILANO

KATHERINE O'NEAL

ORDER FOR EXTENSION

HONORABLE KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Upon consideration of Defendant's First Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 19) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand Administrative Agency Decision, with Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until September 3, 2024, to file a response, and that the date by which Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, be extended by fourteen (14) days, after Defendant files his brief.


Summaries of

Almeda E. v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Jul 29, 2024
CIV. 2:24-cv-2-KRS (D.N.M. Jul. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Almeda E. v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:STACEY ALMEDA E., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Jul 29, 2024

Citations

CIV. 2:24-cv-2-KRS (D.N.M. Jul. 29, 2024)