In Allyn v. Thurston (53 N.Y. 622) and Estes v. Wilcox (67 id. 264) it was held that a creditor at large could not maintain an action to enforce a resulting trust in land purchased and paid for by his debtor and by his direction conveyed to another person.
Summary of this case from Dittmar v. GouldArgued June 2, 1873
Decided June 10, 1873
W.F. Cogswell for the appellant.
Oscar Craig for the respondent.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
In Allyn v. Thurston (53 N.Y. 622) and Estes v. Wilcox (67 id. 264) it was held that a creditor at large could not maintain an action to enforce a resulting trust in land purchased and paid for by his debtor and by his direction conveyed to another person.
Summary of this case from Dittmar v. GouldFull title:RUSSELL ALLYN, Respondent, v . MARY A. THURSTON, Appellant. THE SAME…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 10, 1873
Under ordinary circumstances, the rule always has been that in order to reach equitable assets in the hands…
Mandeville v. CampbellIn this respect it is no different from other equitable assets which may be reached by a creditor upon the…