Allwood Plumbing Heating v. Local Union 274

2 Citing cases

  1. Arista Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Peer Group, Inc.

    316 N.J. Super. 517 (App. Div. 1998)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding "[t]he mere fact that a party-designated arbitrator discloses a prior relationship with the party will not necessarily disqualify the arbitrator"

    Id. at 200, 215, 430 A.2d 214. Appellants reliance on Allwood Plumbing Heating Co., Inc. v. Local Union 274, 199 N.J. Super. 517, 489 A.2d 1243 (App.Div. 198 5), to support their assertion the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider disqualification of a party-appointed arbitrator prior to completion of the arbitration is misplaced. In Allwood Plumbing, we determined plaintiff was not entitled to pre-arbitration relief under the particular facts before us.

  2. Casino Distributors v. Local 331

    267 N.J. Super. 424 (Ch. Div. 1993)   Cited 2 times

    It is also well settled that New Jersey courts will apply federal substantive law when deciding a labor arbitration issue. Allwood Plumbing Heating v. Local Union 274, 199 N.J. Super. 517, 521, 489 A.2d 1243 (App.Div. 1985). Based on the federal standard, a union may not be denied the right to arbitrate "unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute."