From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carraro (In re Allstate Ins. Co.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 29, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2014-02773

07-29-2015

In the Matter of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent, v. Jacqueline CARRARO, appellant.

Bradley Gillam, Melville, N.Y. (Huy M. Le of counsel), for appellant. Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum ], of counsel), for respondent.


Bradley Gillam, Melville, N.Y. (Huy M. Le of counsel), for appellant.

Robert P. Tusa (Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum ], of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, inter alia, to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Jacqueline Carraro appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated November 21, 2013, which granted that branch of the petition which was for a framed-issue hearing, and temporarily stayed the arbitration pending the framed-issue hearing.

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from so much of the order as directed a framed-issue hearing is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal from that portion of the order, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the petition which was for a framed-issue hearing on the issue of whether there was physical contact between the appellant's vehicle and an alleged hit-and-run vehicle, and temporarily stayed the arbitration pending the framed-issue hearing (see Matter of Merchants Preferred Ins. Co. v. Waldo, 125 A.D.3d 864, 4 N.Y.S.3d 246 ; Matter of Allstate Ins.

Co. v. Aizin, 102 A.D.3d 679, 681–682, 958 N.Y.S.2d 706 ; Matter of Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Leconte, 3 A.D.3d 534, 535, 770 N.Y.S.2d 750 ; Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Paredes, 289 A.D.2d 495, 735 N.Y.S.2d 179 ). The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carraro (In re Allstate Ins. Co.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jul 29, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Carraro (In re Allstate Ins. Co.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, respondent, v. Jacqueline…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
13 N.Y.S.3d 843
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6336

Citing Cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Deleon

Here, the petitioner, by submitting the police accident report containing the appellant's statement that his…