From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allstate Ins. Co. v. ASKO Appliances, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
CASE NO.CV 101039RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.CV 101039RS

10-06-2011

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ASKO APPLIANCES, INC., and DOES 1 to 20,. Defendants. ASKO APPLIANCES, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. ASKO CYLINDA A.B., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., and ELTEK S.p.A., Third-Parly Defendants.

GEORGE D. YARON, ESQ. (State Bar #96246) JAMES SILVERSTEIN, ESQ. (State Bar #143543) HIELAM CHAN, ESQ. (State Bar #267321) YARON & ASSOCIATES Attorneys for Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Counter-Defendant ASKO APPLIANCES, INC.


GEORGE D. YARON, ESQ. (State Bar #96246)

JAMES SILVERSTEIN, ESQ. (State Bar #143543)

HIELAM CHAN, ESQ. (State Bar #267321)

YARON & ASSOCIATES

Attorneys for Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Counter-Defendant

ASKO APPLIANCES, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT. OR. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Allstate"), and Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ASKO APPLIANCES, INC. ("Asko"), by and through their respective attorneys of record hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to move the hearing date on Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, which is currently set for hearing, in Department 3, on October 13 at 1 ;30 p.m., to November 3, 2011 at 1:30 pan. or any date thereafter that the Court may set.

The reason that the Allstate and Asko are submitting this Stipulation is that there is a Mandatory Settlement Conference, set for October 25,2011, with Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Allstate and Asko would like to attempt to settle this matter prior to the Court hearing Allstate's Motion. Therefore, Allstate and Asko agree to the following Stipulation in light of their desire to attempt to resolve this matter at the October 25th Settlement Conference before the Court hears Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment:

1. The hearing on Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is continued from October 13 at 1:30 p.m. to November 3, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3, or any date thereafter that the Court may set.

CULBRETH & SCHR OEDER, LLP

ERIC M. SCHROEDER

SALLY NOMA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Allstate Insurance Company

YARON & ASSOCIATES

GEORGE D. YARON

JAMES SIL, VERSTEIN

HIELAM CHAN

Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party

Plain tiff/Counter-Defendant

Asko Appliances, Inc.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Allstate's Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Partial Summary Judgment is continued to November 3 , 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

RICHARD SEEBORG


Summaries of

Allstate Ins. Co. v. ASKO Appliances, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
CASE NO.CV 101039RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Allstate Ins. Co. v. ASKO Appliances, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ASKO APPLIANCES, INC., and DOES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.CV 101039RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)