From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allison v. C.C.D.C Med. Dept.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 20, 2022
2:22-cv-01064-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01064-APG-NJK

12-20-2022

RONALD J. ALLISON, Plaintiff v. C.C.D.C MEDICAL DEPT., Defendant


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

[ECF NO. 7]

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 2, 2022, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Ronald Allison's complaint because Allison did not update his address as ordered. ECF No. 7. Allison did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is accepted and plaintiff Ronald Allison's complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.


Summaries of

Allison v. C.C.D.C Med. Dept.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 20, 2022
2:22-cv-01064-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Allison v. C.C.D.C Med. Dept.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. ALLISON, Plaintiff v. C.C.D.C MEDICAL DEPT., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01064-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 20, 2022)