Opinion
Argued April 14, 1891
Decided April 28, 1891
William N. Dykman for appellant.
Richard S. Newcombe for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued April 14, 1891
Decided April 28, 1891
William N. Dykman for appellant.
Richard S. Newcombe for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:RICHARD D. ALLIGER, Respondent, v . THE BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 28, 1891
In order to justify this claim it should appear that the jury was actuated by passion, prejudice or…
Smith v. MatthewsIn many it has been denied. Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns. 51; Fry v. Bennett, 9 Abb. 53; Whiteman v. Leslie,…