From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allied Witan Co. v. Aro Corp.

U.S.
Oct 4, 1976
429 U.S. 862 (1976)

Summary

holding that district court has power to enforce agreement

Summary of this case from United States v. Sparks

Opinion

No. 76-155.

October 4, 1976, October TERM, 1976.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 531 F. 2d 1368.


Summaries of

Allied Witan Co. v. Aro Corp.

U.S.
Oct 4, 1976
429 U.S. 862 (1976)

holding that district court has power to enforce agreement

Summary of this case from United States v. Sparks

holding that assault as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 113(d) does not require intent to injure

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Padilla

enforcing settlement agreement only where court had discretion, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), to reopen litigation

Summary of this case from Rolex Watch, U.S.A. v. Bulova Watch Co.

noting that the "magistrate was therefore correct in refusing to read into subdivision (d) the requirement of intent to do bodily harm"

Summary of this case from United States v. Fitzgerald
Case details for

Allied Witan Co. v. Aro Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALLIED WITAN Co. v. ARO CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 1976

Citations

429 U.S. 862 (1976)

Citing Cases

Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Allied Chemical Corp.

However, the Lear decision militates against reading such provisions into a settlement agreement. Although…

United States v. Baus

As a legal matter, it is well-accepted that the material breach of a settlement agreement which has been…