From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alliance v. All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-CV-01771-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)

Opinion

          ROBERT J. TUERCK (Bar No. 255741), Jackson & Tuerck, Quincy, CA.

          ANDREW L. PACKARD (Bar No. 168690), ERIK M. ROPER (Bar No. 259756) HALLIE B. ALBERT (Bar No. 258737) Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard, Petaluma, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE.

          THERESE Y. CANNATA, Attorney for Defendants, ALL STAR AUTO WRECKING, INC., JOSEPH, CREAM, SR., and JOSEPH CREAM, JR.


          STIPULATION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(A)(2)] (FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 TO 1387)

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         TO THE COURT:

         Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("CSPA") and Defendants All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc., (aka All Star Auto Recycling), and Joe Cream, Jr. (collectively "ALL STAR"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

         WHEREAS, CSPA, All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc., (aka All Star Auto Recycling), and Joseph Cream, Jr. through their authorized representatives, have settled the case, and a copy of the Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement ("Settlement Agreement") entered into by CSPA and DEFENDANTS is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference;

         WHEREAS, CPSA submitted the settlement agreement via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice ("the agencies") and the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has been completed without objection by the agencies;

         NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

         1. That the Court be requested to approve the Settlement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A;

         2. That CSPA's claims, as set forth in the Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety and as to all defendants, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

         3. The Parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement.

          ORDER

         WHEREAS, the Parties have consented to entry of the foregoing Settlement Agreement and requested the Court's approval and entry thereof; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3), the Parties submitted the Settlement Agreement to the United States Attorney General and the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the 45-day review period has been completed without objection by the agencies;

         WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the Settlement Agreement and fully considered the Parties' request to enter this Settlement Agreement as an order; and

         WHEREAS, the Court finds the Settlement Agreement to be: (1) fair, adequate and reasonable; (2) consistent with applicable laws; and (3) protective of the public interest; and

         WHEREAS, good cause appearing therefore,

         1. THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS HEREBY APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH;

         2. Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's claims against Defendants ALL STAR AUTO WRECKING, INC. (aka ALL STAR AUTO RECYCLING), JOE CREAM, SR., and JOE CREAM, JR., as set forth in the Complaint filed in Case No. 2:11-CV-01771-JAM-CKD, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alliance v. All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-CV-01771-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Alliance v. All Star Auto Wrecking, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

Citations

2:11-CV-01771-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)