From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alliance Transportation, Inc. v. Mayer

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 4, 1983
165 Ga. App. 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

65623.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1983.

Action for damages. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Langham.

Robert C. Semler, David F. Root, for appellant.

William F. Rucker, for appellee.


This appeal follows a jury verdict for the plaintiff in a suit to recover damages for the defendant storage company's failure to return property which the plaintiff had stored in defendant's warehouse. The jury awarded the plaintiff $500 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in exemplary damages. The defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the evidence establishes at most the breach of a bailment contract and that exemplary damages are consequently not authorized. See OCGA § 13-6-10 (Code Ann. § 20-1405). The plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that the verdict was based on tortious conversion of property. Held:

Assuming arguendo that the plaintiff's cause of action was one in tort rather than contract, we find the award of exemplary damages unsupported by the evidence. "In a tort action in which there are aggravating circumstances, in either the act or the intention, the jury may give additional damages to deter the wrongdoer from repeating the trespass or as compensation for the wounded feelings of the plaintiff." OCGA § 51-12-5 (Code Ann. § 105-2002). "[O]rdinarily the question of imposition of punitive damages is for the jury. However, the controlling question ... is whether there was any evidence to support [such an award] ... Absent wilful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness or oppression, there can be no recovery of punitive damages." Moon v. Ga. Power Co., 127 Ga. App. 524, 527 ( 194 S.E.2d 348) (1972). The evidence in this case showed merely that the plaintiff's property was mistakenly mingled with a shipment destined for another state and that when the mistake was discovered, the defendant took steps to return the property to Atlanta. "Mere negligence, although gross, will not alone authorize the recovery of punitive damages." Co-op Cab Co. v. Arnold, 106 Ga. App. 160, 164 ( 126 S.E.2d 689) (1962); also see BLI Const. Co. v. Debari, 135 Ga. App. 299 (2) ( 217 S.E.2d 426) (1976); Delta Air Lines v. Isaacs, 141 Ga. App. 209 ( 233 S.E.2d 212) (1977). The judgment is affirmed with direction that the award of punitive damages is stricken.

Judgment affirmed with direction. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1983.


Summaries of

Alliance Transportation, Inc. v. Mayer

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 4, 1983
165 Ga. App. 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Alliance Transportation, Inc. v. Mayer

Case Details

Full title:ALLIANCE TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. MAYER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 4, 1983

Citations

165 Ga. App. 344 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
301 S.E.2d 290

Citing Cases

Trotter v. Summerour

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Alliance Transp. v. Mayer, 165 Ga. App. 344, 345 ( 301 SE2d 290) (1983).…

Stolle Corporation v. McMahon

However, the controlling question ... is whether there was any evidence to support (such an award).... Absent…