From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allgood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 11, 1981
403 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. AF-66.

September 11, 1981.

Appeal from the Duval County Circuit Court, Lawrence D. Fay, J.

Carl S. McGinnis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Allgood pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of possession of controlled substances reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. The trial court held that the warrantless search of Allgood's person and the seizure of contraband found in his pocket were lawful as a search incident to a lawful arrest. Allgood contends the search and seizure cannot be justified on this basis because the probable cause necessary for a lawful arrest was lacking. We disagree. Based upon Adams v. State, 375 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1980), we find that the officers had sufficient probable cause to arrest Allgood for possession of marijuana. The search was incident to the arrest although the search preceded the formal arrest. Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 110, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 2564, 65 L.Ed.2d 633, 645 (1980).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allgood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 11, 1981
403 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Allgood v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT V. ALLGOOD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 11, 1981

Citations

403 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Poole v. State

And, evidence of the drugs later found after a search incident to arrest, should not have been suppressed.…

Henry v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

In any event, the seizure of the money was lawful because it was incident to an arrest, which is an exception…