Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

2 Citing cases

  1. SSI Techs. v. Dongguan Zhengyang Elec. Mech.

    20-cv-19-jdp (W.D. Wis. May. 23, 2024)

    Obviousness is a legal conclusion based on underlying facts, including “the scope and content of the prior art, the differences between the prior art and the claimed invention, the level of ordinary skill in the art, and any relevant secondary considerations.” Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 726 F.3d 1286, 1290-91 (Fed. Cir. 2013).

  2. Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.

    389 F. Supp. 3d 1169 (N.D. Ga. 2019)   Cited 3 times

    Freedman Seating Co. v. Am. Seating Co. , 420 F.3d 1350, 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2005).Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. , 726 F.3d 1286, 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (citing Graham v. John Deere Co. , 383 U.S. 1, 17, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966) ).Kennametal, Inc. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co. , 780 F.3d 1376, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2015).