From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allende v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

91867

Decided and Entered: February 20, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Richard Allende, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule by refusing a direct order. According to the misbehavior report, petitioner refused to leave the disciplinary office after being directed to do so by a correction officer. Although petitioner asserts that at the time of the incident his requests to speak to a supervisor and to be placed in protective custody were being ignored, he nevertheless was required to obey any direct order given by staff regardless of whether he agreed with it (see Matter of Ross v. Blaine, 267 A.D.2d 538). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and testimony from the correction officer involved provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Wells v. O'Keefe, 286 A.D.2d 791).

To the extent that petitioner asserts that the violation should be ranked no higher than a tier II violation, the reviewing officer determined that the location of the incident in a building which housed the watch commander's office and the arsenal warranted a higher violation classification and we decline to substitute our view for that of the reviewing officer (see Matter of Cliff v. Kingsley, 293 A.D.2d 954;Matter of Moore v. Goord, 280 A.D.2d 717). Petitioner's remaining contentions, even if preserved for our review, would be found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Allende v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Allende v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD ALLENDE, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 916

Citing Cases

Matter of Rodriguez v. Selsky

Petitioner has therefore waived his objections that the Tier I or II charges were improperly consolidated…

In the Matter of Pettus v. Selsky

Petitioner's sole contention on appeal is that the charges in the misbehavior report should have been…