From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allenberg v. Rapken Company, LTD

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 9, 1930
105 Cal.App. 142 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. 7188.

April 9, 1930.

MOTION to affirm a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A.B. McKenzie, Judge Presiding. Motion denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Lucius L. Solomons for Appellant.

J.H. Sapiro and Samuel M. Roeder for Respondent.


[1] Motion to affirm judgment on the ground that appellant has failed to point out or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure any part of the record sufficient to justify a reversal or present any issues before this court as to which said appeal has been taken. An examination of appellant's brief reveals the fact that he has set forth in his brief certain portions of the record. It will be presumed that they are the portions that he desires to call to the attention of the court. ( Schurman v. Look, 190 Cal. 113 [ 210 P. 816].)

The motion is denied.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Allenberg v. Rapken Company, LTD

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Apr 9, 1930
105 Cal.App. 142 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
Case details for

Allenberg v. Rapken Company, LTD

Case Details

Full title:B.P. ALLENBERG, Respondent, v. RAPKEN COMPANY, LIMITED (a Corporation)…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Apr 9, 1930

Citations

105 Cal.App. 142 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
286 P. 1059