From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Feb 16, 2006
No. 1:05-CV-01104-OWW-LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:05-CV-01104-OWW-LJO.

February 16, 2006

Bingham McCutchen LLP, JASON A. YURASEK, MARGARET A. McLETCHIE, ELIZABETH MILLER, BRENDA ALLEN, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff.


ORDER


Based upon Plaintiff's request and Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Hearing Date for the stipulating Defendants' Motions to Dismiss now set for 10:00 a.m. on March 13, 2006 before Judge Wanger in Courtroom Three is continued to April 10, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Wanger in Courtroom Three.

2. Plaintiff's opposition to stipulating Defendants' Motions to Dismiss will be filed no later than March 17, 2006.

3. Stipulating Defendants' reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss will be filed no later than March 31, 2006.

4. Plaintiff may file one consolidated opposition to stipulating Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.


Summaries of

Allen v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Feb 16, 2006
No. 1:05-CV-01104-OWW-LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Allen v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

No. 1:05-CV-01104-OWW-LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2006)