From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Walker

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2013
2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2013)

Opinion


TROY B. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC). United States District Court, E.D. California. September 26, 2013.

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On July 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2013, are adopted in full; and

         2. Defendants' September 14, 2012 motion for summary judgment is granted.


Summaries of

Allen v. Walker

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2013
2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Allen v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:TROY B. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2013)