From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC)

09-26-2012

TROY B. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 14, 2012, defendants filed a motion to refile and reserve their motion for summary judgment beyond the thirty day deadline set in the court's August 3, 2012 order. On the same day, defendants refiled and reserved their motion for summary judgment.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' September 14, 2012 motion for leave to refile and reserve their motion for summary judgment beyond time is granted;

2. Defendants' September 14, 2012 motion for summary judgment is deemed

timely filed;

3. Plaintiff's opposition, if any, to defendants' September 14, 2012 motion for summary judgment shall be filed and served within thirty days from the date of this order; and

4. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than fourteen days thereafter.

______________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Allen v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Allen v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:TROY B. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3032 GEB JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2012)