From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 29, 2005
1:05CV00555, 1:99CR277-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2005)

Opinion

1:05CV00555, 1:99CR277-1.

November 29, 2005


ORDER


On July 22, 2005, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Thereafter, and within the time limit prescribed by Section 636, petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied.


Summaries of

Allen v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 29, 2005
1:05CV00555, 1:99CR277-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Allen v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:LUKE ALLEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Nov 29, 2005

Citations

1:05CV00555, 1:99CR277-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2005)