From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Nov 2, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0546 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0546 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:18-cr-00033

11-02-2020

RICO RODRIQUEZ ALLEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is on remand from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. See ECF No. 89. Movant Rico Rodriquez Allen seeks to appeal this Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order denying relief on his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and adopting the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendations. ECF No. 79. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and has not presented issues adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.3 (1983)). The Court accordingly DENIES Movant a certificate of appealability.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel and the defendant, the United States Attorney's Office, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshals Service.

ENTER: November 2, 2020

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Allen v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Nov 2, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0546 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Allen v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICO RODRIQUEZ ALLEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-cv-0546 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2020)