Opinion
CV418-290
12-13-2018
ORDER
Deantwan Allen seeks relief from his state conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See doc. 1 at 1. His petition reveals that he is incarcerated at Smith State Prison. Id. It further reveals that he was convicted in Fulton County, Georgia. Id. This Court is, therefore, not the proper forum for his petition.
Federal law allows § 2254 petitions to be filed in the district within which petitioner was convicted or in the district within which he is confined. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Wright v. Indiana, 263 F. App'x 794, 795 (11th Cir. 2008). Thus, this Court has jurisdiction over the petition. Nevertheless, it is the longstanding judicial policy and practice to funnel such petitions into the district within which the state prisoner was convicted, since that will be the most convenient forum. Eagle v. Linahan, 279 F.3d 926, 933 n. 9 (11th Cir. 2001); see also Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir. 1970); see Wright, 263 F. App'x at 795. That practice also fosters an equitable distribution of habeas cases between the districts. Fulton County lies in the Northern District of Georgia. See 28 U.S.C. § 90(a)(2). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for all further proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (permitting a district court to transfer any civil action to another district or division where it may have been brought for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice); Rufus v. Kemp, 2013 WL 2659983 at * 1 (S.D. Ga. June 12, 2013).
The Clerk mistakenly filed this as a Savannah Division case, but Tattnall County lies in this Court's Statesboro Division. 28 U.S.C. § 90(c)(4). The mistake is moot, however, because this action is transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. --------
SO ORDERED, this 13th day of December, 2018.
/s/_________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA