From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P

09-27-2011

ANTHONY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for "summary judgment," i.e., motion for entry of default, noting that respondent failed to timely file an answer to the petition. However, respondent timely filed an answer to the petition on September 9, 2011. Doc. 20. Therefore, petitioner's motion is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: that petitioner's September 13, 2011, motion is denied. Plaintiff may file a traverse within 28 days.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Allen v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)