From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P.

September 28, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for "summary judgment," i.e., motion for entry of default, noting that respondent failed to timely file an answer to the petition. However, respondent timely filed an answer to the petition on September 9, 2011. Doc. 20. Therefore, petitioner's motion is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: that petitioner's September 13, 2011, motion is denied. Plaintiff may file a traverse within 28 days.

DATED: September 27, 2011


Summaries of

Allen v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3257 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)