From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 8, 1987
506 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. BN-349.

May 8, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, R. Hudson Oliff, J.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


James Miller Allen appeals his conviction for burglary and his sentence, which departed from the guidelines. We find no merit to appellant's evidentiary issue, and therefore affirm his conviction. The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines based solely on appellant's status as a habitual offender. At the time of appellant's sentencing, the Florida Supreme Court had not yet decided Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1987). In view of that decision, the trial court's reliance on appellant's habitual offender status as a reason for departure from the guidelines was error. We therefore reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. If the trial judge finds that there are other valid reasons to depart, he may do so.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

THOMPSON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 8, 1987
506 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MILLER ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 8, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Morganti v. State

The First District has, in several decisions, reached the same result we reach. Brooks v. State, 509 So.2d…