From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 2000
775 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D00-3167.

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, Thomas S. Reese, J.


Paul E. Allen appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Allen was convicted after a trial of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and sale or delivery of a controlled substance in 1994. He was sentenced to forty years' prison for the continuing criminal enterprise and a concurrent five and one half-years on the other charges. Allen has now alleged numerous instances of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court summarily denied the motion, finding that the claims were either facially insufficient or could be denied on their merits. We agree as to all but one of Allen's claims. Accordingly, we reverse as to that single claim but otherwise affirm the trial court's order.

Allen alleged that counsel was ineffective in failing to object to certain improper arguments made by the prosecuting attorney. Specifically, Allen alleged that the prosecutor argued facts not in evidence related to other drug transactions and drug use by Allen. The trial court denied this claim, finding that Allen had not adequately alleged prejudice. We disagree. There are few errors more prejudicial than a prosecuting attorney arguing about other bad acts which were not properly admitted into evidence and which involved the same type of crime. We therefore reverse and remand on this ground.

On remand the trial court may again summarily deny this claim only if it attaches record documents conclusively showing either that no improper argument was made or that trial counsel objected and preserved the issue for direct appeal. Otherwise, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing on this claim. See Dauer v. State, 570 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1990) (holding that determination whether counsel's action, or lack thereof, was tactical should be made after an evidentiary hearing).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 27, 2000
775 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul E. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

775 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Sanders v. State

The claim that the prosecutor presented an improper and prejudicial argument, that was not objected to by…