From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 7, 2012
100 So. 3d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D12–3783.

2012-11-7

Krystal Rose ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.



Christopher E. Cosden of Wilbur Smith Law Firm, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

, Judge.

Krystal Rose Allen appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Allen was sentenced to ten years' prison followed by fifteen years' probation after a jury convicted her of aggravated child abuse with great bodily harm. This court per curiam affirmed her conviction and sentence on appeal. Allen v. State, 27 So.3d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (table decision).

In her motion, Allen argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the State's evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Our records indicate that on appeal, Allen raised this exact argument and also challenged the sufficiency of the State's evidence at trial. The postconviction court denied the motion on the ground that Allen may not raise claims in a postconviction motion that could have been or were raised on direct appeal. However, “unless a direct appeal is affirmed with a written opinion that expressly addresses the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, an affirmance on direct appeal should rarely, if ever, be treated as a procedural bar to a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel on a postconviction motion.” Corzo v. State, 806 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Hamilton v. State, 979 So.2d 420, 422–23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court improperly denied Allen's postconviction motion on the ground that the ineffective assistance of counsel issue was raised on direct appeal.

Because the postconviction court's determination on this issue did not conclusively refute Allen's claim, we remand to the postconviction court for reconsideration of Allen's motion on the merits. If the postconviction court should again summarily deny this claim, it must attach portions of the record conclusively refuting Allen's allegations.

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 7, 2012
100 So. 3d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Krystal Rose ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

100 So. 3d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

State v. Jackson

A finding that Jackson did not show error apparent on the face of the record to obtain relief on direct…

Allen v. State

Krystal Rose Allen appeals the postconviction court's denial of her motion for relief under Florida Rule of…