From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Mar 6, 2001
39 S.W.3d 75 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77997

DATE: March 6, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE HENRY E. AUTREY.

Nancy L. Vincent, District Defender, Office B, Office of the State Public Defender, Appellate/PCR Division, Eastern District, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, C.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Bernerie Allen, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On direct appeal, we affirmed movant's convictions and sentences for first degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo (1994), and first degree assault in violation of Section 565.050, RSMo 1994. State v. Allen, 954 S.W.2d 414 (Mo.App. 1997).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Allen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Mar 6, 2001
39 S.W.3d 75 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERNERIE ALLEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Mar 6, 2001

Citations

39 S.W.3d 75 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)