From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Spaeth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:18-cv-00808-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-00808-NONE-EPG (PC)

08-31-2021

KEVIN ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. SPAETH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COURT TO ORDER THE PRISON TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO CALL HIS ATTORNEY AND FAMILY

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Kevin Allen (“Plaintiff), a prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, is proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 30, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion pro se, asking the Court to order the prison to allow Plaintiff to call his attorney and family. (ECF No. 77).

The Court hereby gives Defendants fourteen days from the date of service of this order to respond to Plaintiffs motion. Defendants should address the best dates and times for Plaintiffs institution of confinement to make Plaintiff available for telephone calls between Plaintiff and his attorneys.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Spaeth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:18-cv-00808-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Allen v. Spaeth

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DR. SPAETH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-00808-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)