From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2781 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2781 WBS DAD P.

February 29, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's February 25, 2008 request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Allen v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2781 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Allen v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2781 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)