Allen v. Picciano

Full title: EUGENE A. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. CONSTANCE PICCIANO, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 11, 2009

No. CIV S-08-2109 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2109 WBS EFB P.

March 11, 2009

ORDER

WILLIAM SHUBB, District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 22, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Although plaintiff filed a pleading on February 9, 2009, it does not address the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations and plaintiff has not filed objections thereto.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 22, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.