From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Phillips

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 23, 2023
2:22-CV-0011-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-0011-DAD-DMC-P

10-23-2023

ANTHONY L. ALLEN, JR., Petitioner, v. BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are: (1) Petitioner's motion to exclude evidence, ECF No. 40; and (2) Petitioner's request to produce portions of the state court record, ECF No. 41.

A review of the docket reflects that Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss based on failure to exhaust state court remedies. Respondent's motion and any opposition thereto Petitioner may file do not require consideration of any evidence or state court records. Petitioner's motions/requests will be denied without prejudice to renewal should Respondent's motion to dismiss be denied and following lodging of the state court record concurrent with an answer to the petition. By separate order, the Court has granted Petitioner an extension of time to file an opposition to Respondent's motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner's motion, ECF No. 40, is DENIED without prejudice.

2. Petitioner's request, ECF No. 41, is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Allen v. Phillips

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 23, 2023
2:22-CV-0011-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Allen v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. ALLEN, JR., Petitioner, v. BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 23, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-0011-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2023)