Opinion
3:11-CV-00218-PK
02-29-2012
ORDER
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#51) on January 31, 2012, in which he recommended the Court grant in part and deny as moot in part Defendants' Motion (#17) to Dismiss and enter a final judgment in this matter. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc); United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988).
In his Objections, Plaintiff reiterates the arguments contained in his Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#51). Accordingly, the Court
(1) GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#17) to Dismiss Plaintiff's negligence claim against the State of Oregon for lack
of subject-matter jurisdiction, DENIES as moot Defendants' Motion (#17) to Dismiss Plaintiff's negligence claim against the State of Oregon for lack of personal jurisdiction, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's negligence claim without prejudice; and
(2) GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#17) to Dismiss Plaintiffs' § 1983 claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and DISMISSES those claims without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge