Allen v. Oakland Police Dept.

Full title: Deloris ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; Scott…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 2, 2000

217 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2000)

Opinion

217 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2000) Deloris ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; Scott Vaugh; Reginald Garcia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit May 2, 2000

Submitted April 17, 2000. ²

2 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

D.C. No. CV-94-02056-SI

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOZINSKI, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ¹

1 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Deloris Allen appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of due process and equal protection. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,see Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 21, 1996.

AFFIRMED.