From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Mason County Washington

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 2, 2010
Case No. C09-5752 RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. C09-5752 RBL.

March 2, 2010


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT and DENYING MOTION TO REMAND


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend [Dkt. #8] and his corresponding Motion to Remand this matter to State court.[Dkt. #9]. Plaintiff seeks to revise his complaint to emphasize his state law claims. The Motion to Amend [Dkt. #8] is GRANTED.

The Amended Complaint should be filed within SEVEN days of this Order. The Proposed Amended Complaint continues to assert claims under federal law, specifically the 4th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution, and claims for relief, damages, and attorneys' fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. So long as the Complaint contains federal causes of action, this court has "federal question" jurisdiction over it. The Motion to REMAND [Dkt. #9] is therefore DENIED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Mason County Washington

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 2, 2010
Case No. C09-5752 RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Allen v. Mason County Washington

Case Details

Full title:VINCE and JAMI ALLEN, Plaintiffs, v. MASON COUNTY WASHINGTON, D/B/A MASON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

Case No. C09-5752 RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 2, 2010)