Allen v. Marshall

Full title: RICHARD WILLIS WESLEY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 7, 2011

EDCV 08-1780-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2011)

Opinion

RICHARD WILLIS WESLEY ALLEN, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 08-1780-JVS (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 7, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice.