Opinion
Case No. CV 12-1150-DMG (MANx)
02-23-2021
KIM ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HYLAND'S, INC., et al., Defendants.
AMENDED JUDGMENT
This matter came before the Court for a jury trial on September 1 through September 17, 2015 and a bench trial on September 16, 2015. [Doc. ## 409, 411.] The jury rendered a verdict [Doc. # 427], and this Court filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the bench trial [Doc. # 471]. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and remanded in part for further fact-finding to resolve Plaintiff's claim under the unfair prong of California's Unfair Competition Law. [Doc. # 501.] The Court having filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the issue on remand,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Hylands, Inc. and Standard Homeopathic Company and against Plaintiff Plaintiffs Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniele Xenos, and Yuanke Xu as to all of their claims. DATED: February 23, 2021
/s/_________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE