From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Hyland's, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 16, 2016
Case No. CV 12-1150 DMG (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-1150 DMG (MANx)

08-16-2016

KIM ALLEN, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. HYLAND'S, INC., et. al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

This matter having come before the Court for a jury trial on September 1 through September 17, 2016 and a bench trial on September 16, 2015 [Doc. ## 409, 411] and the jury's verdict having been rendered on the jury trial [Doc. # 427] and this Court having filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the bench trial [Doc. # 471],

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Hylands, Inc. and Standard Homeopathic Company and against Plaintiff Plaintiffs Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniele Xenos, and Yuanke Xu as to all of their claims. DATED: August 16, 2016

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Allen v. Hyland's, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 16, 2016
Case No. CV 12-1150 DMG (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Allen v. Hyland's, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KIM ALLEN, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. HYLAND'S, INC., et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 16, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 12-1150 DMG (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)