From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Haviland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 30, 2021
3:18 CV 2839 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

3:18 CV 2839

11-30-2021

Terenzo D. Allen, Petitioner, v. Warden James Haviland, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JACK ZOUHARY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner Terenzo Allen seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). On October 22, 2021, Magistrate Judge Carmen Henderson issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court dismiss the Petition (Doc. 11 at 43).

Although this Court reviews de novo any portions of an R&R to which a party timely objects under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), failure to timely object waives district and appellate court review of the R&R. See Miller v. Currie, 50 F.3d 373, 380 (6th Cir. 1995); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 950 (6th Cir. 1981). The R&R notified Allen that failure to object would result in waiver (Doc. 11 at 43). See Walters, 638 F.2d at 950. Allen has not objected, and the deadline for objections has passed. This Court therefore adopts the R&R (Doc. 11) in its entirety.

The Petition (Doc. 1) is dismissed. There is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Further, an appeal from this Order could not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Haviland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 30, 2021
3:18 CV 2839 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Allen v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:Terenzo D. Allen, Petitioner, v. Warden James Haviland, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

3:18 CV 2839 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 30, 2021)